Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
BJOG ; 2022 Nov 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2236351

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of COVID-19 vaccination received during pregnancy on SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19-related hospitalisation, COVID-19-related ICU admission and maternal-fetal complications. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE, CINHAL, Embase, Scopus, CENTRAL databases; ClinicalTrials.gov, reference lists, related articles and grey literature sources. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, non-randomised studies of interventions, pregnant women, COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Study selection, risk of bias assessment, data extraction and assessment of the certainty of evidence using the GRADE method were performed independently by two authors. Meta-analyses were performed using Cochrane RevMan version 5.4 software. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022308849. MAIN RESULTS: We included 14 observational studies (362,353 women). Administration of a COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy resulted in a statistically significant reduction in SARS-CoV-2 infection [OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.28-0.76] and COVID-19-related hospitalisation [OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.33-0.51]. The effect appeared to be greater in fully vaccinated women, for both infection [OR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.16-0.59] and hospitalisation [OR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.10-0.21]. However, the certainty of evidence was very low. The difference in COVID-19-related ICU admission between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals did not reach statistical significance [OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.13-2.58]. Finally, there were no statistically significant differences in any of the maternal-fetal complications considered in the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccination administered during pregnancy seems to reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalisation, with no significant effects on maternal-fetal complications.

2.
Heart ; 106(19): 1519-1524, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-628656

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: It has been hypothesised that the use of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) might either increase or reduce the risk of severe or lethal COVID-19. The findings from the available observational studies varied, and summary estimates are urgently needed to elucidate whether these drugs should be suspended during the pandemic, or patients and physicians should be definitely reassured. This meta-analysis of adjusted observational data aimed to summarise the existing evidence on the association between these medications and severe/lethal COVID-19. METHODS: We searched MedLine, Scopus and preprint repositories up to 8 June 2020 to retrieve cohort or case-control studies comparing the risk of severe/fatal COVID-19 (either mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission or death), among hypertensive subjects treated with: (1) ACE inhibitors, (2) ARBs and (3) both, versus untreated subjects. Data were combined using a random-effect generic inverse variance approach. RESULTS: Ten studies, enrolling 9890 hypertensive subjects were included in the analyses. Compared with untreated subjects, those using either ACE inhibitors or ARBs showed a similar risk of severe or lethal COVID-19 (summary OR: 0.90; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.26 for ACE inhibitors; 0.92; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.12 for ARBs). The results did not change when both drugs were considered together, when death was the outcome and excluding the studies with significant, divergent results. CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis strongly supports the recommendation of several scientific societies to continue ARBs or ACE inhibitors for all patients, unless otherwise advised by their physicians who should thus be reassured.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Humans , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Adv Biol Regul ; 77: 100736, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-601020

ABSTRACT

By the end of May 2020, SARS-CoV-2 pandemic caused more than 350,000 deaths worldwide. In the first months, there have been uncertainties on almost any area: infection transmission route, virus origin and persistence in the environment, diagnostic tests, therapeutic approach, high-risk subjects, lethality, and containment policies. We provide an updated summary of the current knowledge on the pandemic, discussing the available evidence on the effectiveness of the adopted mitigation strategies.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pandemics , Patient Isolation/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Age Factors , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Humans , Incidence , Italy/epidemiology , Masks , Models, Statistical , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Isolation/methods , Physical Distancing , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Quarantine/ethics , Quarantine/methods , Quarantine/organization & administration , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL